In what could be described as an official Federal agency doing what it does best, the Orwellian-named Environmental Protection Agency in the course of its duties made a well-intentioned but badly planned exploratory excavation at the site of the Gold King Mine. This excavation triggered a release of
The moment that the EPA folks might have said, "Uh... Oh, no." A small leak begins to seep a new flow after their exploratory excavation. Photo: EPA - Your government in action |
The spill itself points to a larger problem that Colorado and the western states have ignored for some time and will not simply "go away." Some estimates put the number of potential problems near 55,000 sites. While not all of these sites are going to turn loose a toxic brew of lead and arsenic compounds, they are going to continue to challenge Colorado and the nation with potential spills in the foreseeable future. At this point, reactionary plans at the EPA are just going to anger more and more of the population around the Four Corners with poisoned taps, poisoned livestock, and poisoned crops. One can only assume that tourism is the next thing to go.
The bitter irony is that the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad's original reason for construction by the Rio Grande, to capture revenue by servicing the mines of Silverton, is now threatening its present stock-in-trade, the scenery of the Animas River, for which tourists pay top dollar. Until residents of the San Juan district, the state, and the nation make the decision to fix the problems of the past, they will continue to lose their future. If mines were stabilized and the stained rocks of the Animas were cleaned up and restored, I would wonder if we have enough engines to haul yellow narrow gauge trains filled with tourists up & down the Animas each day. So, San Juan residents, Coloradoans, and Americans, what do you choose: yellow rivers of poisoned water or rivers of yellow revenue trains of tourism?◊
The two photos in your post with the date/time stamp in the lower right came from EPA's own page http://www.epaosc.org/site/image_listview.aspx?site_id=11082&category= . Notice what happens when you click on that link now.
ReplyDeleteI did my best to create an archive link https://archive.is/iDLpb of the whole photo collection on 8/12, but now it only shows the last of 32 pages and just 5 of the 191 images that used to be there. At the Durango Herald's photo gallery, they saved 10 photos from that collection: http://www.durangoherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/gallery?Site=DU&Date=20150808&Category=NEWS01&ArtNo=808009999&Ref=PH#/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=DU&Date=20150808&Category=NEWS01&ArtNo=808009999&Ref=PH&Item=8&NewTbl=1&MaxH=400
Unless someone can point it out, I have yet to find an official EPA explanation of why those photos were deleted, or even an acknowledgment that they ever had that big collection of the incident's 'before/during/after' photos.
Thanks for commenting, Mr. Cook!
DeletePersonally, I would rather the EPA not try to sanitize things that they can learn from. Transparency, while causing some initial embarrassment, promotes trust and level-headed thinking. WRT politics and direction, I have no agenda besides maybe getting the government to help Colorado with cleaning up the mining legacy. One would think the EPA would be a prime player in doing so. I only wish they had seized the opportunity to address the long term problem that will not go away.
Thanks again for stopping by and giving the update!